Entries
Saturday, 5 May 2007
CULTURAL POST THREE:
For Some Hispanics, Coming to America Also Means Abandoning Religion
By Laurie Goodstein
New York Times
April 15, 2007
On Sunday afternoons, when the local Roman Catholic Church holds Mass for Spanish-speaking Catholics, Edgar Chilín is playing soccer in a league with hundreds of Hispanic players. As a child in Guatemala, Mr. Chilín attended Mass every Sunday. But after immigrating to the United States 25 years ago, he and his family lost the churchgoing habit. “We pray to God when we feel the need to,” he said, “but when we come here to America we don’t feel the need.”
A wave of research shows that increasing percentages of Hispanics are abandoning church, suggesting to researchers that along with assimilation comes a measure of secularization. Several studies show that Hispanics are just as likely as other Americans to identify themselves as having “no religion,” and to not affiliate with a church. Those who describe themselves as secular are, without question, a small minority among Hispanics — as they are among Americans at large. But, in contrast to many of the non-Hispanic Americans who identify themselves as secular, most of the Hispanics say they were once religious. The Roman Catholic Church, the religious home for most Hispanics, is experiencing the greatest exodus. While many former Catholics join evangelical or Pentecostal churches, the recent research shows that many of them leave church altogether.
“Migrating to the U.S. means you have the freedom to create your own identity,” said Keo Cavalcanti, a sociologist at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Va., and a co-author of a recent study that found a trend toward secularization among Hispanics in Richmond. “When people get here they realize that maintaining that pro forma display of religiosity is not essential to doing well.”
A separate study of 4,000 Hispanics to be released this month by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and the Pew Hispanic Center found that 8 percent of them said they had “no religion” — similar to the 11 percent in the general public. Of the Hispanics who claimed no religion, two-thirds said they had once been religious. Thirty-nine percent of the Hispanics who said they had no religion were former Catholics. Hispanics from Cuba were the most secular national group, at 14 percent, followed by Central Americans at 12 percent, Puerto Ricans and Dominicans at 9 percent, and South Americans at 8 percent, the Pew poll found. Mexicans in this country were the least likely to say they had no religion, at 7 percent.
A larger survey, called the American Religious Identification Survey, a study of 50,000 adults, including 3,000 Hispanics, found that the percentage of Hispanics who identified themselves as having no religion more than doubled from 1990 to 2001, to 13 percent from 6 percent. This change is happening even though many Hispanics emigrated from countries steeped in religion, where saints’ days and festivals mark the passage of time, and grandmothers round up their progeny each Sunday to go to Mass.
“They come, they adopt the American way, and part of the American way is moving towards no religion,” said Ariela Keysar, associate director of the Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture at Trinity College in Hartford. Each year, Diana Lemus — a real estate agent and owner of Happy Mart, a busy Latino market in Richmond — makes New Year’s resolutions that include working out more, getting out of debt, being a better mother and attending church once a week. Ms. Lemus, a first-generation immigrant, said that this year she had kept all of them, except going to church — and spends Sunday mornings at the gym. She thinks her faith is important, but said that perhaps she has grown “too materialistic.”
“I need God in my life, but I told the pastor, I get sleepy,” she said. “You have to stay in church from 1:30 to 5. I think if services were shorter, more entertaining.” Like Ms. Lemus, many Hispanics in Richmond said that even though they no longer attended church, their religion remained important to them. This confirms research findings that Hispanics who said they had no religion represent a small subset; many more Hispanics are living rather secular lives but still identify themselves as Catholics or Christians. The phenomenon is similar to that of “cultural Jews,” said Roberto Suro, director of the Pew Hispanic Center. “You can feel very strongly about the Virgin of Guadalupe and believe your children ought to be baptized, and still not participate in the Catholic Church or make it a major factor in your life,” Mr. Suro said.
Richmond and adjacent Chesterfield County have a rapidly growing and diverse Hispanic population, with immigrants from the Caribbean, Central America, Colombia and Mexico. Some are new arrivals, but many have been in the United States for years and resettled here from Northeastern and Southern states, attracted by the area’s jobs, relatively affordable housing and receptive local governments. The increase in the Hispanic population has meant a proliferation of churches. But even when their own churches are thriving, Hispanic ministers say that most Hispanics they approach are not interested.
“Church is not very popular,” said Francisco Hernandez, who is pastor with his wife, Connie, of the Iglesia de Dios Alfa y Omega, a Pentecostal church with 400 members. “The majorities don’t go, and those who go, go one time.” Asked why, he said that his church’s strict rules were a hard sell, adding, “People like a superficial religion.”
This may be true, and a few young Hispanic women said in interviews that they avoided strict evangelical churches because they frowned on women wearing pants or makeup. However, many more Hispanics said they were simply too busy to attend any church. They said Sunday is a work day, or it is their only day off to wash clothes, go to the market, do errands and relax. Before Mirna E. Amaya and her husband bought their restaurant, Palacio Latino, three years ago — and when she lived in Maryland — she went to Mass every Sunday. Now she says she is working too hard to go, even though she says she misses it.
“In El Salvador, people went to the church because there’s nothing much else to do,” Mrs. Amaya said. She said that some of her women friends had stopped going because they became disillusioned with the Catholic Church after the priest sexual abuse scandals. But she said the Roman Catholic Church was still her preference. The closest parish, St. Augustine Catholic Church, has bent over backward to minister to Hispanics. It offers Mass in Spanish, classes in English, a medical van, job assistance and an instant community for lonely new arrivals. The Sunday Spanish Mass is standing room only.
And yet, the pastor, Msgr. Michael Schmied, also the vicar for the diocese’s Hispanic Apostolate, said: “My fear is the strength of secularization, the influence of Americanized pop culture. Is the spiritual tradition of the church, Catholic and Protestant, strong enough to withstand the secularizing cultural influences?”
Jesus Cerritos, a 37-year-old construction worker who emigrated from Mexico 18 years ago, said he spent his weekends running errands, going to Wal-Mart and watching television. His children, ages 11 and 9, tell him that church is boring and that they have no desire to go, but Mr. Cerritos has mixed feelings. “Here, the people get more materialistic,” Mr. Cerritos said. “The culture here is really barren. There are no traditions.” If he were still living in his hometown of Guanajuato, he said, “I would probably go to church.”
MY OPINION:
Hispanic, as used in the United States, is one of several terms used to categorize native and naturalized U.S. citizens, permanent residents and temporary immigrants, whose background hail either from Spain, the Spanish-speaking countries of Latin America or the original settlers of the traditionally Spanish-held Southwestern United States.
I certainly agree with the article that going to America means abandoning religion; however, again, I don’t think it only applies to America. Countries like Japan, too, are losing their religion. Temples in Japan are merely just tourist attractions, of which not many Japanese citizens actually visit regularly for religious purposes, maybe just for good luck and blessings.
As a whole, I believe globalisation is taking over the world, of which religions, cultures, and even traditions are lost through the process. Why so? People these days are getting more and more materialistic, just like when people were too obsessed with materialistic progress during the Industrial Revolution and even after that.
People all around the world are getting too materialistic and they start abandoning their religion, neglecting their own cultures and traditions. I think it is rather of a pity that such beautiful religion, cultures and traditions that existed for thousands and thousands of years are suddenly lost when globalisation takes place. I may be a person of no religion, a free thinker; however, my family truly believes and respects various religions.
My father prays to the Indian elephant-god, Ganesha every night, occasionally buying jasmine flowers as an offering. Also, when my family goes back to Japan to visit my grandmother and other relatives, we would then climb the mountains and visit the shrine, or just go to a nearby temple to pray. Sometimes, we go for church services when our friends invite us to, during festive occasions like Christmas. We accept all religions and believe they are special in their own ways.
Personally, I believe such beautiful ‘creations’ should not be destroyed and people should still continue to be religious. Yes, globalisation makes people more materialistic, but at least the citizens should try to remain religious, to go to church regularly, and visit the temple regularly. Religion is one thing that makes people believe that their existence is God’s creation, and to make them appreciate life.
What would the world be like without religion? Life will be boring, just having breakfast at Starbucks, lunch at McDonalds and then dinner at KFC, not knowing what life is for, and how globalisation benefits us.
However, no doubt, globalisation is making everyone abandon what they believed in before, their religion, their culture, and even their tradition, and it is turning Earth into a materialistic world.
WHAT A DEVIL!
It slowly entraps us into its evil clutches,
Slowly devouring our beliefs,
Wipes out our hopes and dreams,
And destroys the world;
Day by day
RIMIKO signing off
- because there's really no need to, anymore...
11:40:00 pm
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Health Post: SARSThe processes which are intensifying human interaction across boundaries of nations, time and ideas in economic, health and environment, society and culture, knowledge and technology and political and institutional spheres. –Kelley Lee’s definition on Globalisation
Can be regarded as a second industrial revolution, affecting all sectors of society
–Clare Short’s definition on Globalisation
Globalization of travel, food production and environmental degradation is increasing the threat from infectious diseases, old and new as Kelley Lee has stated. Historically, the worldwide spread of infectious diseases has coincided closely with a gradual process of globalization over many centuries. This implies that health issues have been raised as an effect of globalisation due to the spread of diseases across barriers of space, time and culture. In terms of health, globalization has both helped to spread some of the deadliest infectious diseases known to humans, yet also reshaped the social geography within which humanity strives to create health or prevent disease, from Wikipedia. Some of the most acknowledged international diseases are plague, measles, small pox, malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, and one of the most recent diseases in the world is SARS. In this post, the issue of SARS, will be discussed to show the effect of globalization on the aspect of health.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SARS:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome or SARS is a respiratory disease in humans which is caused by the SARS coronavirus. There has been one major epidemic to date, between November 2002 and July 2003, with 8,096 known cases of the disease, and 774 deaths (a mortality rate of 9.6%) being listed in the WHO's April 21, 2004 concluding report.
As we can see from the above table and diagrams, the transmission of SARS epidemic took place in Toronto, Singapore, Taiwan, Canada, several provinces in China, and many other countries, making it an international disease. Although only a small number of people with SARS can become severely ill, it is one of the most focused diseases in several countries such as Canada and China, and international organizations such as World Health Organization (WHO).
It is also “well-known” diseases in Singapore and has detrimental effect on Singaporeans during the peak of the disease. This can be seen from the numerous establishments of precautionary measures such as quarantines, screening and temperature-checking by the Singapore government to control the spread of SARS in Singapore. This is due to the fact that the illness is believed to spread from coughing and sneezing or from direct face-to-face contact with a person who has SARS.
From
http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/180_04_160204/lee10732_fm.html:
As Ruggie writes,
Globalisation does not come in tidy sectoral or geographically demarcated packages. It is all about interconnections — among people; across states, in production networks and financial markets; between greed and grievance; among failing states, terrorism, and criminal networks; between nature and society. The complex interrelatedness of issues and their cumulative, often unforeseen, consequences demand far greater policy coherence than the existing system of national and international institutions has been able to muster.Hence, from this issue, we can see that the effect of globalization in the epidemic of SARS is a negative one as the disease can be spread easily due to intimate physical contact between human beings, and the increase in transportation connectivity due to globalization has increased the rate at which SARS can be spread. Thus the epidemic of SARS has shown us a clear view of the disadvantage of globalization in the aspect of health in this case.
RONG QI Signing Off
- because there's really no need to, anymore...
7:37:00 pm